Population Density and Air Pollution: Should Incentives Be the Same Across U.S. Cities and States?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18335/region.v13i2.672

Abstract

Population concentration generates both economic benefits and environmental costs through agglomeration-related spatial externalities. This paper examines how population density shapes fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations across U.S. states over the period 2000–2023, conceptualizing density as a structural driver of nonlinear environmental externalities within regional systems. Using a balanced panel of all fifty states, I estimate fixed-effects models in which logged PM2.5 is modeled as a flexible quadratic function of logged population density, allowing coefficients to evolve over time and across density regimes.

The results reveal a convex relationship between population density and PM2.5, indicating that the environmental externalities of agglomeration increase at an accelerating rate over much of the density distribution. However, the strength of this nonlinear effect has weakened over time, consistent with regulatory adaptation and technological diffusion. A split-regime analysis further shows that the curvature of the density–pollution relationship differs systematically between low- and high-density states, suggesting heterogeneity in regional externality structures.

These findings contribute to the regional science literature by demonstrating that the environmental consequences of population concentration are nonlinear, heterogeneous, and dynamic within an advanced economy context. More broadly, the results highlight the importance of incorporating spatial externalities and governance scale into density-sensitive regional policy design, particularly in transportation investment, land-use planning, and environmental regulation.

References

Climate Change Academy (2025) Aerosols and climate change: Dual roles in warming and cooling. Web page. Available at https://climatechange.academy/introduction-to-climate-change/aerosols-climate-change-warming-cooling

EPA -- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2025) Air quality statistics report. Retrieved November 27, 2025, from https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data/air-quality-statistics-report

Fan C, Chien YH, Mostafavi A (2022) Human mobility disproportionately extends PM2.5 emission exposure for low-income populations. Preprint, arXiv. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.15381

Han S, Sun B (2019) Impact of population density on PM2.5 concentrations: A case study in Shanghai, China. Sustainability 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11071968

Hird C, Perron MMG, Holmes TM, Meyerink S, Nielsen C, Townsend AT, Caritat P, Strzelec M, Bowie AR (2024) On the use of lithogenic tracer measurements in aerosols to constrain dust deposition fluxes to the ocean southeast of Australia. Aerosol Research 2: 315–327. https://doi.org/10.5194/ar-2-315-2024

Hoaglin D (2016a) Regressions are commonly misinterpreted. Stata Journal 16: 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1601600103

Hoaglin D (2016b) Regressions are commonly misinterpreted: A rejoinder. Stata Journal 16: 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1601600106

IPCC -- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2021) Short-lived climate forcers. In: Masson-Delmotte V (ed), Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

Ito A, Miyazaki Y, Taketani F, Iwamoto Y, Kanaya Y (2023) Marine aerosol feedback on biogeochemical cycles and the climate in the anthropocene: Lessons learned from the Pacific Ocean. Environmental Science: Atmospheres 3: 782–798. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EA00156J

Kahn ME, Walsh R (2015) Cities and the environment. In: Duranton G, Henderson JV, Strange WC (eds), Handbook of regional and urban economics, Volume 5. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam NL, 405–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59517-1.00007-6

LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to Spatial Econometrics/ (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York NY. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420064254

Mahowald NM (2011) Aerosol indirect effect on biogeochemical cycles and climate. Science 334: 794–796. 10.1126/science.1207374

Ramanathan R (2002) Introductory Econometrics with Applications/ (Fifth ed.). South-Western Thomson Learning, Mason OH

Sellegri K, Simó R, Wang B, Alpert P, Altieri K, Burrows S, Hopkins F, Koren I, McCoy I, Ovadnevaite J, Salter M, Schmale J (2024) Influence of open ocean biogeochemistry on aerosol and clouds: Recent findings and perspectives. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 12: 00058. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00058

Tauberer J (2025) Historical population of the U.S. States - Spreadsheet (CSV). Github repository. Retrieved November 27, 2025, from https://github.com/JoshData/historical-state-population-csv

Wang Q, Kwan MP, Zhou K, Fan J, Wang Y, Zhan D (2019) The impacts of urbanization on fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations: Empirical evidence from 135 countries worldwide. Environmental Pollution 247: 989–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.086

WHO -- World Health Organization (2021) What are the WHO air quality guidelines?newblock https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/what-are-the-who-air-quality-guidelines

WHO -- World Health Organization (2025) Health and air quality co-benefits of climate change mitigation: Technical brief. World Health Organization

Wooldridge JM (2009) Introductory econometrics: A modern approach/ (5th ed.). South-Western/Cengage Learning, Mason OH

Zhang Y, Zhou Q, Chang K (2022) Long term variation of population exposure to PM2.5 in Eastern China: A perspective from SDG 11.6.2. Preprint. available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.14275

cover_672

Downloads

Published

2026-09-14

How to Cite

Arbel, Y. (2026) “Population Density and Air Pollution: Should Incentives Be the Same Across U.S. Cities and States?”, REGION. Vienna, Austria, 13(2), pp. 101–114. doi: 10.18335/region.v13i2.672.

Issue

Section

Articles
Share