An Index to Characterize the Multi-Dimensional Nature of Land Use Regulations in the Greater Houston Metropolitan Area
Although housing prices and the lack of real income growth are cited as the main factors behind the housing affordability problem, it has been proven that land use regulations have some responsibility as well. Indices have been the most common indicator used to characterize the stringency of local land use regulations; however, these studies focus primarily on those most stringent regulatory environments, and therefore there is no evidence of the validity of such indices in areas regarded as less stringent. In response to this lack of evidence, using a unique data set this article presents an index characterizing local regulatory environments in a well-known less stringent regulatory environment: the Houston-Galveston Area in Texas. This index proves to be a valid measure capable of capturing the multi-dimensional nature of land use regulations. The analysis of the index and statistical correlations validate the use of indices to characterize metropolitan land use regulations.
AIP. (1976). Survey of State Land Use Planning Activity. Report to the US Department of Housing and Urban Development. Washington, DC.: American Institute of Planners.
Baldassare, M., & Protash, W. (1982). Growth controls, population growth, and community satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 47(3), 339-346.
Bandura, R. (2008, 04/01/2010). A Survey of Composite Indices Measuring Country Performance: 2008 Update, from http://www.thenewpublicfinance.org/background/measuring.pdf
Bates, L. J., & Santerre, R. E. (1994). The determinants of restrictive residential zoning: some empirical findings. Journal of Regional Science, 34(2), 253-263.
Black, J. T., & Hoben, J. (1985). Land price inflation. Urban Geography, 6(1), 27-49.
Bright, E. (2005). Is There a Need to Contain Growth?. In Wagner, F. (Eds.) (2005) Revitalizing The City: Strategies To Contain Sprawl And Revive The Core. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Burnell, B. S., & Burnell, J. D. (1989). Community interaction and suburban zoning policies. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 24(3), 470-482.
Coste, J., Fermanian, J., & Venot, A. (1995). Methodological and statistical problems in the construction of composite measurement scales: A survey of six medical and epidemiological journals. Statistics in Medicine, 14(4), 331-345.
Cutsinger, J., Galster, G., Wolman, H., Hanson, R., & Towns, D. (2005). Verifying the Multi-Dimensional Nature of Metropolitan Land Use: Advancing the Understanding and Measurement of Sprawl. [Article]. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(3), 235-259. doi: 10.1111/j.0735-2166.2005.00235.x
Dain, A. (2006). Reference Guide to Residential Land-Use Regulation in Eastern Massachusetts: A Study of 187 Communities. Cambridge/ Boston.: Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston, Harvard University/Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research.
Donovan, T., & Neiman, M. (1992). Community social status, suburban growth, and local government restrictions on residential development. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 28(2), 323-336.
Freudenberg, M. (2003). Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment. OECD, Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry.
Glaeser, E. L., & Ward, B. A. (2009). The causes and consequences of land use regulation: Evidence from Greater Boston. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 265-278.
Glickfeld, M., & Levine, N. (1992). Regional growth and local reaction: The enactment and effects of local growth control and management measures in California. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Green, R. K. (2009). Commentary. In Glaeser, E. L., & Quigley, J. M.(Eds.) (2009). Housing Markets and the Economy: Risk, Regulation, and Policy. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Gyourko, J., Saiz, A., & Summers, A. (2008). A new measure of the local regulatory environment for housing markets: The Wharton residential land use regulatory index. Urban Studies, 45(3), 693-729. doi: 10.1177/0042098007087341|issn 0042-0980
HUD. (1991). Report to Congress on Rent Control. Washington, DC: Office of Policy Development and Research: The US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Ihlanfeldt, K. R. (2007). The effect of land use regulation on housing and land prices. Journal of Urban Economics, 61(3), 420-435.
Knaap, G. (1998). The determinants of residential property values: Implications for metropolitan planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 12(3), 267-282.
Lewis, P., & Neiman, M. (2000). Residential Development and Growth Control Policies: Survey Results from Cities in Three California Regions. San Francisco, California: Occasional Paper, Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco.
Linneman, P., Summers, A., Brooks, N., & Buist, H. (1990). The state of local growth management. Wharton Real Estate Working Paper No. 81.
Malpezzi, S. (1996). Housing prices, externalities, and regulation in U.S. metropolitan areas. Journal of Housing Research, 7(2), 209-241.
Malpezzi, S. (2009). Commentary. In Glaeser, E. L., & Quigley, J. M.(Eds.) (2009). Housing Markets and the Economy: Risk, Regulation, and Policy. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.: .
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Statistics Working Paper, Paris.
Nardo M., T. S., Saltelli A., Andropoulos C., Buescher R., Karageorgos G., Latvala A. and Noel, & F. (2004). The e-business readiness composite indicator for 2003: a pilot study: EUR 21294.
NMHC. (1982). Rento Control Activities through May 31, 1982: National Multi Housing Council. Washington, DC.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill Series in Psychology (3rd Ed.).
Pendall, R., Puentes, R., & Martin, J. (2006). From traditional to reformed: A review of the land use regulations in the nation's 50 largest metropolitan areas. Metropolitan Policy Program.
Quigley, J. M., & Raphael, S. (2005). Regulation and the high cost of housing in California. American Economic Review, 95(2), 323-328.
Quigley, J. M., & Rosenthal, L. A. (2005). The effects of land-use regulation on the price of housing: What Do We Know? What Can We Learn? Cityscape, 8(1), 69-137.
Segal, D., & Srinivasan, P. (1985). The impact of suburban growth restrictions on U.S. housing price inflation, 1975-78. Urban Geography, 6(1), 14-26.
Somerville, C. T. (1999). The industrial organization of housing supply: Market activity, land supply and the size of homebuilder firms. Real Estate Economics, 27(4), 669-694.
Copyright (c) 2018 Luis Estevez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
REGION is an open journal, and uses the standard Creative Commons license: Copyright We want authors to retain the maximum control over their work consistent with the first goal. For this reason, authors who publish in REGION will release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license. This license allows anyone to copy and distribute the article for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given to REGION and the authors. For details of the rights authors grant users of their work, see the "human-readable summary" of the license, with a link to the full license. (Note that "you" refers to a user, not an author, in the summary.) Upon submission, the authors agree that the following three items are true: 1) The manuscript named above: a) represents valid work and neither it nor any other that I have written with substantially similar content has been published before in any form except as a preprint, b) is not concurrently submitted to another publication, and c) does not infringe anyone’s copyright. The Author(s) holds ERSA, WU, REGION, and the Editors of REGION harmless against all copyright claims. d) I have, or a coauthor has, had sufficient access to the data to verify the manuscript’s scientific integrity. 2) If asked, I will provide or fully cooperate in providing the data on which the manuscript is based so the editors or their assignees can examine it (where possible) 3) For papers with more than one author, I as the submitter have the permission of the coauthors to submit this work, and all authors agree that the corresponding author will be the main correspondent with the editorial office, and review the edited manuscript and proof. If there is only one author, I will be the corresponding author and agree to handle these responsibilities.